05.29.07
I think I’ve misplaced a limb somewhere…
Right now I don’t have internet access in my flat.
This makes me cry.
My powers of endurance are being tested to the limit…
*is apprehensively waiting for the explosion-sound*
Hehe, no worries to my fan-club out there tho’… things are really pretty rosy in the (real) world of Rachel. Lack of onlinedness should not be read into too deeply! Even work is overwhelmingly rosy, which may sound surprising to the casual observer given the circumstances, but nevertheless could hardly be more true! ![]()
05.24.07
ant attack
So much for not-getting bitten by the bed bugs… I’ve just flicked my second ant off the airbed.
The first ant I found through here was quite a cheeky little monster. I usually make an attempt to ignore my insect-phobia, so today as I was hanging around the kitchen in the company of a whole selection of said friends, I assured myself that all the “creeping feelings” all along my arms and legs were really just my imagination.
There was to be no panic attack, or anything of the kind. I assured myself that at least some point in the evening I’d have an ant take a shortcut over my hand on route to that breadcrumb over the way. So, it was going to happen, and I was going to survive, and all was going to be ok in the world.
And I *was* managing just about fine. Came through to get ready for bed, and then just when I thought I was safe and let down my guard, to my horror, there he was. Crawling presumptously up my left arm.
But not for long… he was dislodged in the fastest possible – undirected -way… and so landed on my bed. I wasn’t having any of that either though… so before I could think about it too much, with one sweeping gesture he was on the floor. Ant killer, I am.
Tho’ I think I just might prefer Nippon Ant Killer after all…
Ps: While typing this out, I nearly lept a foot in the air, throwing my laptop up in some curiously unsensible fashion… just cos the cable happened to touch my leg!
I’m sooo good at getting over my phobias.
05.18.07
“Don’t let the bed bugs bite.”
Sometimes we don’t realise what we’ve lost ’til some long-forgotten memory triggers a wrenching feeling.
I got that today.
I always knew when I came home from school that one summer’s day that my life would be completely changed. In fact, my dear Mum and Dad probably said something along those lines to me.
Since then, I’ve described that day to myself as “the day my world turned upside down”. As time has passed, I’ve realised the reality is even more complicated than that, as my world has done a few more complete 180 degree flips. (about two, I’d say)
None of them so directly connected to a particular date or event, but all of them with such a ‘conspiracy theory’ connotation that if I didn’t know I’d lived through them, the thought of having to live through them again would be enough to make my stomach churn in triple-motion.
My parents have – as parents do – tried to protect me from hurt as I’ve been getting used to this living business. But that day, they realised they couldn’t protect me from the events that had occurred. They couldn’t even protect themselves.
It was a surprise to me to discover that. The knowledge was a big burden to bear. Not that they left me to bear it alone – they were still holding it tight above my shoulders so I wouldn’t have to feel the weight of it. But the big difference was that they had drawn aside the curtain and pointed its existence out to me.
I suppose that was the day I grew up.
Theoretically, that statement makes perfect sense. I guess I could have told you that that was the day I grew up ever since the day itself. But it was more just a pure statement of fact, rather than something that was ‘real’ to me.
The trigger of a distant memory changed that for me today. I was on the phone to my Mum, when she “signed off” with an old favourite “Goodnight, sleep tight, don’t let the bed bugs bite!”
It suddenly struck me how she hasn’t said that to me “since I was a kid”. I think I *was* still a kid before that fateful day. That’s when I can last remember crawling under my covers behind the wardrobes in my own secret corner of ‘the girls room’.
I miss those days, I think. And I love my parents.
05.17.07
the new girl on the block
I suppose I could tell you I’ve moved…
Like, IRL-moved, not anything totally mind-boggling like moving my blog or anything (just in case anyone out there was getting worried
)
Technically, most of the ‘move’ happened last Friday, after an emotional key-collecting occasion. Just couldn’t get the work situation out my head, and how afraid I was – and am – about how much my friends and I will end up being split up from each other by the changes.
Work-wise, I’m more confident than ever that things are moving in the right direction. But even when things are 95% correct, there’s still the 5% of mistakes which have the potential to cause an awful lot of frustration to us down in the grass roots, if they just happen to be tunnelling under our desk-area. But, I’m keen that that isn’t going to happen
But, I’m tangenting again… The flat is just fine
for anyone who’s interested (and hasn’t seen it… yet!) I don’t mean its perfect. I’m sure I can – and will – spend countless hours “making it all good”. But I do mean I really have absolutely nothing at all I can actually complain about! It is a good size/ location/ layout/ temperature/ safe-feeling/ everything else that matters.
Current status is that I have a washing-machine delivery due tomorrow, which if everything goes to plan, means I could be completely moved this weekend
a whole week earlier than I’ve been expecting!
Other than that, I’ve done the obligatory trip to Ikea. Didn’t buy the bonsai tree. Forgot to take my shopping list… just all the usual bland details
Of course, my friends have been amazing! Stuff was moved/ unpacked/ cleaned/ fixed/ locked up/ examined for dust, and all with a very kind intention. And then I was pizza-supplied, and got to sit on plastic chairs, and had to offer less than my desired level of hospitality to willing volunteers. It was all quite lovely!
I wonder if I’d just closed my eyes and sat very still and quiet if one day I’d have gone to sleep in the old flat, and woken up in the new flat
Ok, it wasn’t *quite* that surreal, but I think everyone tried their very best to get as close to that magical scenario as they could, without actually being magic!
So, thankyou so much everyone! You all know who you are!
(At least I hope you do
) *plans emergency identity-crisis mentoring*
05.14.07
Justification for my title…
After having been asked more than once to do my readers the favour of spoon-feeding the ‘true meaning’ of my title, I felt obligated to have a draft “placemarker” sitting there for a good few weeks now.
So, here I go…
Somehow it may seem strangely ironic that one of the most personal things about my blog is actually the title. But then, it would be rather blatantly obnoxious to have a blog title, and be blogging so many quite personal things, yet be too shy to actually “let on” what the blog is all about!
Now, the honest truth is that although “a glass beaker with a star inside” has been a “self-portrait quote” for years, there’s really not just one reason for why I’ve picked it as the title for my blog. It would be more accurate saying there is a collection of half-reasons that even I cannot fully explain.
To give a bit of context to it all, originally when I came up with the title I was in fifth year in school. Higher English, being encouraged to be creative, all that jazz. Not that I would ever let my ‘true’ creativity see the light of day, though…
(or so I thought!)
Ok, so to actually get to the meat of the post…
Glass, because glass is transparent. You can see right through it. And what’s that got to do with me? Well…
- being naive – this is perhaps the one I feel most ashamed of, yet is likely the truest
- telepathy/ESP/other dubiously amusing theories
- the honest open-ness I strive for
- having made sign-language even more of an art form than I thought possible
Glass is also somewhat fragile… but even I am not owning up to that side quite yet
I’m sure that, given time, enough tears will have been visible to convince even the most hardened sceptic.
The beaker? Well, I needed something star-sized
yet suitably low-key to act as a container. I suppose it is also a nod in the direction of my scientific side.
And the star…
Well, I like to think of myself as a warm, friendly person. Ok, I know stars are rather closer to burningly hot than ‘warm’, but I’m not too keen on the idea of being too too warm – the glass beaker round it should shield off some of the heat, anyway. I’m aiming for that “just about right” balance, so I’d rather stretch the analogy to include ‘warm’ – artistic license and all that
Stars are known for their light-giving properties. I would love to think I could provide light and happiness and a positive aspect to the lives of all those I come in contact with. Whether or not this is an accurate description of me is not for me to judge… but at least the fact that I care about bringing ‘brightness’ into people’s lives can probably also be taken from this analogy.
So yeah, a bit of a mish-mash of lots of stuff in there, but prettily compacted into a few seemingly innocuous ‘common’ words. But whatever the reasons, I’m sure it can easily be open for debate… or be opening a pandora’s box, one of the two!
I guess that’s the real reason I’ve taken so long to ‘explain’ my title – I actually didn’t want to state in black-and-white just how much of a self-portrait it really is. The way that I’ve felt as if even if I wanted to, I wasn’t free to keep secrets secret. And that my life wasn’t – nor ever could be – a secret. Hard as it was when I first realised this in fifth year, I don’t regret it for one moment. But just sometimes I do find it frightening.
05.07.07
being a kid
Recently a crowd of us just-no-longer-teenagers were sitting around ruminating together, when one of my friends said just out the blue:
“I remember when I was a kid, I used to think it must be so boring just sitting around talking.”
That rather tickled me! I can still remember those days – just – when that worry was true. Being reminded of it was like finding a long-lost corner of my childhood still living quietly away by itself, perfectly contented to be left in peace by me, but welcoming when it sees me return.
Sometimes I can’t understand what I must have done all day every day as a kid. The days always seemed far too short, and I had to go to bed far too early, and I was always not-allowed to do far too many things…
But somehow I’m beginning to realise maybe those days weren’t so bad after all…!
Imagine your biggest worry being whether or not you are going to enjoy sitting around chatting!
*dreams*
05.03.07
So, just a normal day in the office…
…or just maybe not!
It was strangely mundane to return to the real world late this afternoon. I was sitting in the office of my IFA as he photocopied some more documents for my mortgage application. And, that actually calmed me down a bit. It was just so life-goes-on-ish to be watching the trees outside silhouetted against a prettily-perfect blue sky, and being able to smile at my IFA as he told me how everything was pretty much done and dusted for me to have got all my currently-unearned money suitably spent.
But, to get back to un-reality…
Sometime between getting off the train this morning and reaching my desk, I managed to walk through a rip in the space-time continuum without even noticing. Ok, maybe I wouldn’t have minded as much if I’d actually been aware of it, but I was a little gutted that I could go through so excitingly controversial an experience and not actually notice!
Ok, seriously now, all that was code for “pretty weird day” but then, I guess that goes without saying!
Thankfully, I am unlikely to be as deeply affected by the “changes at work” as some people. I guess if I was thinking totally of number one first, I could allow myself the “don’t take risks” aspects of choosing to neatly side-step the latest set of challenges presented to us.
But somehow that doesn’t really appeal to me…
I want to continue to work for one of the best companies in the world. I want to learn to understand the challenges faced by a multi-national company in todays fast-moving economy. I want to get on my train every morning, and have a wee chat with the work-crowd, irrespective of their “level” in the company.
I want to be able to trust my management team.
But it also works both ways, I suppose. Management *have* been making lots of changes recently. They have been saying they want to know what we think, and now (as someone commented with reference to our governmental elections, also taking place today) this is “the ultimate poll” for our management team.
Will we have the initiative to get behind them this time round?
There comes a time when we have to say, “Actually, yes, you are pushing at that flywheel… we can see it moving – however slowly and imperceptibly at first – but moving nonetheless.” We can’t continue to say nothing is happening when it is – ‘cos then we’re lying. And if we refuse to recognise the truth, then it becomes only right and proper that people shouldn’t trust *us*.
Ok, yes, we’re scared of getting bitten (again!) but we can’t let that fear numb us into a self-fullfilling prophecy where our very negativity becomes the direct cause of our downfall. Much as we might all want a soft cushion to lay our heads down on when the strain is a bit heavy, being in one of the top companies in the entire world is never going to be the “cushy pillow” option.
I think the time has come.
I’m not going to be jumping ship…
*rolls up her sleeves, and gets ready to start pumping water with renewed vigour*
*gives disapproving glances over her shoulder to anyone not following her example
* (Hehe, sorry folks, I couldn’t resist!)
being NICE
Ok, before I’d finished typing up the last post, I’d already decided I needed a follow-up that was more geared towards you, my dear reader. And then I decided I should quit being selfish, and actually put you first
So, posting for you first, and then this next post is an exceedingly personal opinion about my work at the moment. I know I said earlier that I was wary about posting work-stuff up here for all to see, but I thought I wasn’t spreading out anything confidential, so I’ve plunged in anyway…
However, even while writing, I was thinking how a lot of the stuff that applies to me may not neccessarily apply to those in different situations from me. And I was worried in case any of it would come across as overly harsh, when if I’m going to be harsh on anyone, there’s a little girl I know very well who could do with some motivation!
So… this whole thing of taking risks, and how much of a risk is reasonable. Well, obviously having dependents would make one want to be more responsible. Then there’s how healthy you are financially. And every other factor both emotionally, physically, mentally, socially, environmentally, politically… yes, I’m getting carried away a bit here!
Anyway, what I’m trying to say, is that there is quite a lot asked of you when you work for a company worth working for.
I’m not saying don’t make the commitment. I am saying, know what commitment you are making, and be prepared to deal with the cost.
There’s nothing wrong with having a contingency plan set up and ready to roll – I’m thinking this seems quite a viable and sensible option just in general – never mind where you work, or how safe your job – but maybe that’s just me!
I’ve met tons and tons of people in my life who try and spend their whole lives avoiding a good bit of hard labour. Ok, I quite like a good relax myself every now and again, but I see nothing wrong with choosing to spend a bit of effort doing something that may have no tangible value more than – for example – improving my peace of mind.
But to many people I’ve met, the thought of doing a little extra work “for yourself” seems ludicrous. Yet I would gladly sacrifice a little of my own time to myself
if, by so doing I could give myself something emotionally meaningful: the peace-of-mind that the mortgage was still getting paid even if I lost my job tomorrow. I’d think that would be an amazing position to be in!
So, my advice – if anyone really cares what a little girl thinks! – is have a backup plan, and *then* motivate yourself to think you’re never going to need your backup plan
Timekeeping
I wish I could have a watch that would just randomly change time every so often. Like, just skip two minutes forward, or something. This might sound like one of my craziest ideas yet… but just give me a chance
to explain.You see, I have this annoying bad habit of always leaving as late as possible to go anywhere. I usually tend to be doing something, and want to do as much as possible before heading off for wherever it is that I’m going.
But I really really hate being late for things. In school and uni I got to be rather proud of my reputation for immaculate time-keeping. (Tho’ in latter years, immaculate attendance was enough of a talking-point never mind time-keeping.)
So… this is where time-keeping devices come into play. Of course, if you want to fine-tune your timing to this accurate a level, you need to be pretty sure of where you stand time-wise at all times… or so you would think!
Well, there’s the classic “set your watch fast then you’ll never be late for anything” advice. But no… it doesn’t hold true for me. I tend to work on ‘relative time’: It takes me x-minutes to get somewhere, need to be there by y-(watch)-time, so I just do the comparative sums.
And no matter how I try and convince myself to allow more than x minutes, or pretend that y-watch-time corresponds to GMT slightly differently from how it really does, I just can’t seem to get this model working. I’m a computer scientist… sums come out either right or wrong. They’re just not wishy-washy entities.
So that leaves me with limited alternatives.
- Don’t wear a watch. Ok, been there, done that, worn the t-shirt to every university exam I’ve ever sat. (Ok, I would certainly not advise that tactic to any budding students out there… it was a very deliberate and thought-out decision, and I always believed I would regret it, tho’ I never have!)
- Use multiple out-of-sync time-keeping devices. This one actually works better than you may think.However, after five years of this, I’m reluctantly becoming just too much of an expert for even my liking. Ok, I do appreciate being able to catch my train with a pretty decent degree of accuracy… but I’m beginning to notice my timekeeping ’slip’ as I’ve begun to memorise how much “out” the clocks at work are from my desktop pc, and exactly how many seconds it takes me to appear in front of a different whiteboard than usual.
- Have a variable watch. So yeah, one consistent place to ‘timesync’ my efforts by, yet at the same time, deliciously unreliable so I continually have to be re-adjusting my time-calculations to take account of the most recent variations.
Ok, I can see a raft of practical difficulties in implementation of this latest idea… Even just having a set of meaningful logical principles behind it (in order to be able to code it up) yet have those principles suitably unpredictable to dis-enable me from “factoring them in” is a large enough hurdle that I’m not even going to think about trying to jump it at the moment.
But, if someone else were to do all the hard work,
I suspect I’d quite happily invest in the little wrist-decoration! Albeit with very opinionated ideas about how they’d not sorted out all the principles correctly, but it would be a million times better than a watch that – of all things – told you the real time!
05.02.07
disagreeing with important people
Spurred on by a friend to keep up-to-date with the reith lecture goings-on, I’ve listened to the first three since the beginning of this week.
There’s a lot of interesting thought-provoking stuff in there. I don’t agree with a host of the opinions of Jeffrey Sachs, but I do have a real sympathy with many of the goals he is aspiring to. I have therefore continued to listen to him speak motivationally about these goals, despite having to bite my tongue at some of the theories he has about how to obtain these goals.
However, during listening one quote in particular has been bugging me. It really bugs me, for the simple reason that it isn’t true.
Ok, the truth of the general statement is, I’m guessing, an unprovable matter. But I can at least present a justification for one particular word being deceptive, and so ‘untrue’ in my book.
“Our problems are manmade – therefore, they can be solved by man.”
President John F. Kennedy
Is it just me… or is that “therefore” looking rather ‘floppy’ in there?
Just in case there’s anyone who doesn’t quite appreciate its true floppiness, I’m going to argue my case. (Ok, well, I want to rant it off my chest anyway! So I’m going to rant
whether I have an excuse to or not…)
The word “therefore” suggests that what has gone before is somehow an explanation or a justification for the conclusion that is stated.
So, if you accept the ‘premise’ – or starting point – of the argument, and if you’re willing to be rational, then accepting the truth of the premise means you have not a leg to stand on if you want to deny the conclusion.
Ok, to get all technical about it, the format of argument used here is not quite just purely wrong. What we have here is a group of premises, which could – in theory – fully support the conclusion in question. But what is so cunningly annoying about it, is that only one of the premises is actually stated out in the open. The other premises are just assumed – assumed to be recognised, assumed to be agreed with, and (critically) assumed to be true.
Fair enough, they might all *be* true… but if you’re presenting the justification of something, you don’t do so by missing out the evidence.
If I was being cynical, I could give you my first draft of the idiots guide to ‘utilising’ this kind of fallacy:
- Gather your set of premises.
- Pick the easiest one to justify as being black-and-white true.
- Use that one as the solitary “open” premise.
- Present your arguement with no reference at all to the other premises.
When I see this kind of thing in practice, it always sets the alarm bells off at full volume. I always ask why, if someone has got that strong a case for being right in the first place, why don’t they show their true strength in being open about it in the first place. But this paragraph shouldn’t really be part of my argument – its a rather circumstantial kind of poke-in-the-back.
Anyway, to go back to Kennedy’s quote, I would reject this conclusion as untrue, because I do not accept the truth of one of the other (assumed) premises – I’m not going to tangent into giving my reasons for disagreeing here
but feel free to prod me if you’re interested! But, to un-digress, disagreeing with even one required premise, it logically becomes perfectly fair game to deny the conclusion.
However, the part that twists me up all wrong, is that if I were to say to someone just straight out without explaination “I don’t agree with Kennedy’s conclusion” I suspect I would be met with astonishment, and disbelief. “Why are you being irrational?” “You can’t deny the premise, so you must be denying the principles of sound logic… surely?”
Urm, no… actually I’m not!
Actually I’m the one being rational. Actually I’m the one that’s gone to the effort of putting the structure together in my head to justify to myself I’m being rational. Actually, I’m the one wanting to get “the complete picture” instead of relying on what is the hidden-but-assumed-to-be-true premise of the argument.
I guess what I’m trying to say here, is that by obscuring not only the evidence, but also the true structure of the argument, the general perception of the argument is very often not too much squared with reality.
So, I just utterly despise it when some statement of fact is preceded by a “therefore” joiner and another statement. A statement that of itself is true, but that carries very little weight – if any – as far as backing up the conclusion is concerned. Yet it slyly receives some weight because it is a true statement. By pretending there is some ‘reasoning’ going on, the conclusion is thereby given extra credence.
There’s an awful lot that is said by that little word “therefore”. Yes, I am reading quite deeply between the lines, but I don’t think I’m reading anything that isn’t actually written there.
And so, I rest my case. The word “therefore” – as quoted – is a lie.
OCD disclaimer: *is counting down the seconds until someone points out something logically unsound about my argument here… in an analogus way to this.*


